Steven's and Bob Van Howe's Journal of Medical Ethics AAP Paper Attacked by Brian Morris in JME

Brian Morris and colleagues have published in the Journal of Medical Ethics (JME) a paper attacking the paper published earlier this year in the JME by me and Bob Van Howe, which critically analyzed the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP's) 2012 position statement and technical report regarding neonatal circumcision. The publication in the JME of the Svoboda-Van Howe paper was accompanied by the concurrent publication of a response by the AAP that attempted to suggest bias on behalf of me and Bob without being able to point to a single specific error anywhere in our article.

Morris' paper, entitled "Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision," is attached to this email. I have also attached the original paper by Bob and me that Morris is attacking. It is interesting to note, however, that Morris seems even more upset with the AAP for not forcefully recommending universal neonatal circumcision than he is with us.

AttachmentsFile typeSize
Morris, "Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision," Journal of Medical Ethics 2013.159.86 KB
Svoboda, Van Howe, "Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest AAP policy report on neonatal circumcision," Journal of Medical Ethics 2013.162.67 KB

Comments