Informed Consent For Neonatal Circumcision: An Ethical And Legal Conundrum

Tuesday October 1, 2002

Douglas A. Canning
“Informed Consent For Neonatal Circumcision: An Ethical And Legal Conundrum”
The Journal of Urology, the official publication of the previously somewhat foreskin-hostile American Urological Association, praised the consent article by Svoboda, Van Howe, and Dwyer, predicting that the article “will be used to support the argument of those who would favor outlawing routine circumcision.”
Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, Fall 2000.
Journal Of Urology, Volume 168, pp. 1650-1651, October 2002.
www.cirp.org/library/legal/canning1/

Comments

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <h2><h3><p> <br> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><tr><td><th><hr><hn>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.

Call for Abstracts

GENITAL AUTONOMY 2014
“Whole Bodies, Whole Selves: Activating Social Change”
Genital Autonomy Logo
The 13th International Symposium on Genital Autonomy and Children’s Rights

University of Colorado
Boulder, Colorado, USA

July 24-26, 2014

Click here to view abstract guidelines and submission details.

Subscribe

Subscribe below to receive important email updates from ARC.

Manage my subscriptions